Powders For the 300 blk. Links to published Data added.

Moderators: gds, bakerjw, renegade, bamachem

User avatar
gds
Silent But Deadly
Posts: 3711
Joined: Thu Nov 01, 2012 9:43 am
Location: Sandhills of North Carolina

Re: Powders For the 300 blk. Links to published Data added.

Post by gds »

MMA10mm, that is the only thing I have found so far from barnes. i will add it to the OP.
Yes, I am a Baptist, and yes I carry a gun. You might think I carry a gun because I don't trust God. Well you would be wrong. I have complete faith in my Lord. It is mankind I have no trust in
User avatar
gds
Silent But Deadly
Posts: 3711
Joined: Thu Nov 01, 2012 9:43 am
Location: Sandhills of North Carolina

Re: Powders For the 300 blk

Post by gds »

MMA10mm wrote:
slickh wrote:Will A#9 work well with the lighter bullet weights like H110 will?
Sorry, Slickh, it took me awhile to access my 300 loadbook. Here's some light bullet AA#9 data:
  • Wspr 110 gr Sierra HP (#2110) 1.975” AA #9 17.5 grs 2100 fps 10.0” 221 Rem Fed. 205M Sierra manual 5th Edition
    Wspr 125 gr Sierra SPT (#2120) 2.050” AA #9 16.2 grs 1850 fps 10.0” 221 Rem Fed. 205M Sierra manual 5th Edition
    Wspr 135 gr Sierra SPT (#7350) 2.100” AA #9 15.9 grs 1800 fps 10.0” 221 Rem Fed. 205M Sierra manual 5th Edition
    Wspr 150 gr Sierra FMJ, SPT, or MK 2.250” AA #9 15.5 grs 1700 fps 10.0” 221 Rem Fed. 205M Sierra manual 5th Edition
    Wspr 165 gr Sierra HPBT or SBT 2.160” AA #9 14.7 grs 1650 fps 10.0” 221 Rem Fed. 205M Sierra manual 5th Edition
    Wspr 165 gr (unknown) ?.???" AA #9 08.1 grs 1033 fps 16.5” 221 Rem. Rem. 7.5 SSK
This is all Whisper data, but should work fine in Blk. All loads shown were considered MAX by the listed sources, so start low and work up.
one of the links in the OP lists #9 for several loads. an old 300 whisper page from sierra.
Yes, I am a Baptist, and yes I carry a gun. You might think I carry a gun because I don't trust God. Well you would be wrong. I have complete faith in my Lord. It is mankind I have no trust in
User avatar
MMA10mm
Silent But Deadly
Posts: 572
Joined: Wed Dec 11, 2013 12:55 pm

Re: Powders For the 300 blk

Post by MMA10mm »

gds wrote:
MMA10mm wrote:
slickh wrote:Will A#9 work well with the lighter bullet weights like H110 will?
Sorry, Slickh, it took me awhile to access my 300 loadbook. Here's some light bullet AA#9 data:
  • Wspr 110 gr Sierra HP (#2110) 1.975” AA #9 17.5 grs 2100 fps 10.0” 221 Rem Fed. 205M Sierra manual 5th Edition
    Wspr 125 gr Sierra SPT (#2120) 2.050” AA #9 16.2 grs 1850 fps 10.0” 221 Rem Fed. 205M Sierra manual 5th Edition
    Wspr 135 gr Sierra SPT (#7350) 2.100” AA #9 15.9 grs 1800 fps 10.0” 221 Rem Fed. 205M Sierra manual 5th Edition
    Wspr 150 gr Sierra FMJ, SPT, or MK 2.250” AA #9 15.5 grs 1700 fps 10.0” 221 Rem Fed. 205M Sierra manual 5th Edition
    Wspr 165 gr Sierra HPBT or SBT 2.160” AA #9 14.7 grs 1650 fps 10.0” 221 Rem Fed. 205M Sierra manual 5th Edition
    Wspr 165 gr (unknown) ?.???" AA #9 08.1 grs 1033 fps 16.5” 221 Rem. Rem. 7.5 SSK
This is all Whisper data, but should work fine in Blk. All loads shown were considered MAX by the listed sources, so start low and work up.
one of the links in the OP lists #9 for several loads. an old 300 whisper page from sierra.
You know what? I think those are the same as the ones on my load book. Yes, Sierra manual, 5th edition... Mine are the same as those. Sorry for the duplication.
User avatar
USMC FURY
Silent But Deadly
Posts: 225
Joined: Fri Jan 10, 2014 10:17 pm

Re: Powders For the 300 blk. Links to published Data added.

Post by USMC FURY »

User avatar
USMC FURY
Silent But Deadly
Posts: 225
Joined: Fri Jan 10, 2014 10:17 pm

Re: Powders For the 300 blk. Links to published Data added.

Post by USMC FURY »

Last edited by USMC FURY on Sat Jan 18, 2014 6:45 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
gds
Silent But Deadly
Posts: 3711
Joined: Thu Nov 01, 2012 9:43 am
Location: Sandhills of North Carolina

Re: Powders For the 300 blk. Links to published Data added.

Post by gds »

Thanks USMC, I will edit and add quarterbore link to the OP. Also a few the others from the above post. Although a couple of them are already in the OP.


I am leery to add Steves pages, which frankly is a great place to start on just about every round out there. Because He had some problems a few years back with people linking to his stuff. I may contact him and see if he is ok with it.

Also reloaders nest I will think about. They have a lot of the whisper stuff, but others published Data is more along the lines of what I want to keep in this thread for actual load Data. Let me do me research on that one.
Yes, I am a Baptist, and yes I carry a gun. You might think I carry a gun because I don't trust God. Well you would be wrong. I have complete faith in my Lord. It is mankind I have no trust in
180wanabe
Member
Posts: 10
Joined: Thu Jan 10, 2013 2:18 am

Re: Powders For the 300 blk

Post by 180wanabe »

gds wrote:
lupy123 wrote:Has N120 been discontinued? The LGSs by me that carry VV can not get 120.
Honestly I don't know. I have not seen a lot of the VV powders in my area.

Was talking to the Lapua guys today and it seems that they recently Acquired VV, so they are aware of the problem that theres not much on the market and they are trying to get production back inline so they can catch up.
User avatar
MMA10mm
Silent But Deadly
Posts: 572
Joined: Wed Dec 11, 2013 12:55 pm

Re: Powders For the 300 blk. Links to published Data added.

Post by MMA10mm »

gds wrote:Thanks USMC, I will edit and add quarterbore link to the OP. Also a few the others from the above post. Although a couple of them are already in the OP.


I am leery to add Steves pages, which frankly is a great place to start on just about every round out there. Because He had some problems a few years back with people linking to his stuff. I may contact him and see if he is ok with it.

Also reloaders nest I will think about. They have a lot of the whisper stuff, but others published Data is more along the lines of what I want to keep in this thread for actual load Data. Let me do me research on that one.
For what it's worth gds, I prefer to stick with published load data from sources where there is some pressure testing or some other vetting for safety/accuracy. I'd prefer to leave those links off, but it's your thread.
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: AlinMi and 63 guests