Page 2 of 2
Re: Barrel preference
Posted: Mon Oct 10, 2016 12:38 am
by Dr Fumbles
I might just have to get an x-caliber.
I would bet that a aluminum sleeved barrel would do a better job on cooling and could match or beat the weight at a lower cost. Something like JP's thermal dissiaptor but as a permanent install
Re: Barrel preference
Posted: Tue Oct 11, 2016 2:36 pm
by hoser
A-Game wrote:I guess you should tell Daniel Horner he shouldn't have been using 300 Blackout
Big difference when a power factor is a factor.
It is rare these days to find a 3-gun match that recognizes power factor. Most everything thing now is time plus.
And Daniel isn't buying his ammo...
Re: Barrel preference
Posted: Mon Oct 17, 2016 9:28 pm
by rebel
I have an x caliber barrel,not in a 300 but a 6 x45. A true piece of craftsmanship. Well made and unbelievably precise.
Re: Barrel preference
Posted: Mon Oct 17, 2016 10:53 pm
by A-Game
I'm glad to see good things about them from Rebel and Dellet, I have been thinking about using X caliber for a couple builds
Too many ideas floating around in my head
Re: Barrel preference
Posted: Tue Oct 18, 2016 12:26 pm
by RookieShooter
smustian wrote:I do not compete but my Wilson Combat SS Fluted Match Grade is a tack driver.
I concur.
Re: Barrel preference
Posted: Sat Jan 14, 2017 11:22 pm
by Eberle
smustian wrote:I do not compete but my Wilson Combat SS Fluted Match Grade is a tack driver.
I agree mine is too.
Re: Barrel preference
Posted: Thu Mar 30, 2017 5:54 pm
by GunFunZS
Has anyone tried the faxon 16" barrel with the carbine length gas and enlarged port?
I'm looking to put a gun together specifically for 3 gun, but I would like it to run the full range of ammo from subs to supers. I probably don't need the very best precision on the market, but I don't want POI shift as it warms up during a volume shooting stage.