Page 2 of 2
Re: suppressor size to Db suppression ratio for minimal added length
Posted: Fri Oct 28, 2016 12:56 am
by riude
Ah, yes, I should set my words better. I was talking about physics, gas flow etc and research how to optimize inner design for maximum supression with minumum size.
And pack all that in decent price customer product.
I consider silencer in hunting as part of weapon. It must have reliable, rugged bomb proof design. And withstand thousands and thousand rounds. Without service.
Usually extra weight gives you also more accuracy and recoil handling.
Re: suppressor size to Db suppression ratio for minimal added length
Posted: Mon Oct 31, 2016 8:07 pm
by RAINS
Ask and you shall receive. 3d printed Titanium suppressors with nickle alloy blast baffle. Plus they are made 20 miles away from me!
https://www.deltapdesign.com/suppressor ... essor.html
As soon as I win the lottery I am going to buy one. This can is in my mind the best 300blk SBR suppressor.
R
Re: suppressor size to Db suppression ratio for minimal added length
Posted: Mon Oct 31, 2016 11:05 pm
by A-Game
RAINS wrote:Ask and you shall receive. 3d printed Titanium suppressors with nickle alloy blast baffle. Plus they are made 20 miles away from me!
https://www.deltapdesign.com/suppressor ... essor.html
As soon as I win the lottery I am going to buy one. This can is in my mind the best 300blk SBR suppressor.
R
I would agree with you on paper. 2" diameter, short, and lightweight. 1900.00 puts it out of my reach
Re: suppressor size to Db suppression ratio for minimal added length
Posted: Tue Nov 01, 2016 1:25 am
by riude
Recoil, flash, and sound reduction are excellent, with a unique deep, smooth tone to the report.
Sound reduction is excellent? Makes me wonder why such high-end equipment ain´t tested more, and real results published
To me, that sounds like expensive bling bling.