I typed this on my phone the other night and it misspelled PARTICULAR. Big deal. It got the man out of problem status and into pending didn't it?Netpackrat wrote:I hope you ran it through spell check first.
hardcase, glad I could help out.
Moderators: gds, bakerjw, renegade
I typed this on my phone the other night and it misspelled PARTICULAR. Big deal. It got the man out of problem status and into pending didn't it?Netpackrat wrote:I hope you ran it through spell check first.
KERTWOOD wrote:I typed this on my phone the other night and it misspelled PARTICULAR. Big deal. It got the man out of problem status and into pending didn't it?Netpackrat wrote:I hope you ran it through spell check first.
hardcase, glad I could help out.
Yep, you really do over think this stuff...hardcase wrote:What is so peculiar about my correspondence with ATF recently and in the past is I think their heart is in the right place as far as wanting to help. It is just so typical of a bureaucratic agency needing to get the right wording in the right box. It is almost like the agency is not allowed to think.
This was my second SBR. The first one last summer was an AR-15 in 5.56. I figured the ATF would not want me to have two calibers of the same SBR for personal use.
In addition a 5.56 makes a very poor SBR, but I doubt they know a 5.56 makes a very poor SBR.
dtom29 wrote:Yep, you really do over think this stuff...hardcase wrote:What is so peculiar about my correspondence with ATF recently and in the past is I think their heart is in the right place as far as wanting to help. It is just so typical of a bureaucratic agency needing to get the right wording in the right box. It is almost like the agency is not allowed to think.
This was my second SBR. The first one last summer was an AR-15 in 5.56. I figured the ATF would not want me to have two calibers of the same SBR for personal use.
In addition a 5.56 makes a very poor SBR, but I doubt they know a 5.56 makes a very poor SBR.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 55 guests