Hearing Protection Act

Moderators: gds, bakerjw, renegade

broadoakarmoury
Member
Posts: 25
Joined: Mon Jan 23, 2017 10:25 am

Re: Hearing Protection Act

Post by broadoakarmoury »

Well said Jim, I think you laid out a clear plan of action, that actually seems achievable. Be great to see things go that way in the next 4 (or 8, fingers crossed) years.
User avatar
Jim Timber
Silent But Deadly
Posts: 2348
Joined: Thu Dec 20, 2012 6:55 am
Location: Minneapolis, MN
Contact:

Re: Hearing Protection Act

Post by Jim Timber »

I'd like to go after SBR's this session, but I haven't gotten around to contacting Reps to try to pen a bill yet. It seems like an easy sell if you make the case that they were listed in a failed attempt to ban pistols, and we still have pistols without the NFA BS.

It also seems like when you stack a bullpup up against a SBR AR, the OAL favors the longer barreled shorter platform; so we can make the case that the law doesn't achieve what it intended to and thus should be expunged. The Keltec RFB has a 24" barrel (the one I had did) and is the same length as a 16" carbine AR. I need to look at the P90 again before I try to wrap it up in a concise "package" that can be shared in a single visual (like a meme for expanding our rights) that we can start using to drum support.

One issue with legislation is that it takes time to get the word around to enough people to make hearing a bill worthwhile. Unless we educate our legislators ahead of time, it falls on deaf ears if it makes it out of committee and people who might not oppose it still don't get on board because they don't know enough about it to weigh in.

HPA is a prime example: it's been in existence for 3 sessions now. Never went anywhere in '15, got some more momentum in '16, and now we're in '17 with a lot of Reps signing on as co-sponsors and a Senate sibling bill (which is mandatory for passing the law). That's how you get shit done.
https://squareup.com/market/SimpleThreadedDevices
https://www.facebook.com/SimpleThreadedDevices
JoeLiberty
Member
Posts: 26
Joined: Fri Apr 29, 2016 12:27 pm

Re: Hearing Protection Act

Post by JoeLiberty »

'Repeal the NFA' petition is at 91,000 signatures. If you haven't already then go sign it.
https://petitions.whitehouse.gov/petition/repeal-nfa

The HPA has been sent to committee "The Subcommittee on Crime, Terrorism, Homeland Security, and Investigations". This is the same spot it died last time. I wrote my rep, Rep. Cedric Richmond (D). Apparently, he is not a fan.
Here is the list of this committee's members:
Republicans:
Chairman Trey Gowdy (SC-04)
Vice Chairman Louie Gohmert (TX-01)
Rep. Jim Sensenbrenner, Jr. (WI-05)
Rep. Steve Chabot (OH-01)
Rep. Ted Poe (TX-02)
Rep. Jason Chaffetz (UT-03)
Rep. John Ratcliffe (TX-04)
Rep. Mike Bishop (MI-08)
Rep. Martha Roby (AL-02)
Rep. Mike Johnson (LA-04)

Dems:
Ranking Member Sheila Jackson Lee (TX-18)
Rep. Ted Deutch (FL-22)
Rep. Karen Bass (CA-37)
Rep. Cedric Richmond (LA-02)
Rep. Hakeem Jeffries (NY-08)
Rep. David Cicilline (RI-01)
Rep. Ted Lieu (CA-33)

Blow up their inboxes. ASA makes it super easy: http://americansuppressorassociation.co ... ction-act/
g22rmr
Silent But Deadly
Posts: 196
Joined: Sat Jul 06, 2013 7:07 pm

Re: Hearing Protection Act

Post by g22rmr »

Rep. Ted Deutch (FL-22)


Literally no point in contacting this Deutch. See what I did there. All I can do is keep voting against him.

Gowdy and Chaffetz need to be pushed on this. They didn't get results on all the investigations. Now is the time for results, put up or shut up.
User avatar
gds
Silent But Deadly
Posts: 3711
Joined: Thu Nov 01, 2012 9:43 am
Location: Sandhills of North Carolina

Re: Hearing Protection Act

Post by gds »

The HPA, while not how I would want things, is a step in the right direction. I fully support the concept of completely destroying the NFA, and the ATF for that matter, but the reality is, that will not happen, at least not in one fell swoop.

I can accept, for now the step of listing suppressors equivalent to pistols, even though as others have stated, they are not firearms. IF we can get the HPA thru, in the process take away the stigma of , only "assassins and snipers need suppressor". Then maybe we can begin to show the silliness of calling a muffler a firearm.

The whole NFA needs to go. But again, reality, we will never get that in one bill. Start with suppressors, then move onto SBRs, SBS, AOW, then maybe we can get MGs. Although in honesty, I think the best we can hope for there is that the will open the registry to be able to add more MGs.

An example, in my state of NC, we were able to push thru legalizing hunting using suppressors. Then when it was obvious that doing so did not create the mass poaching, the the naysayers predicted, we were able to push thru removing restrictions on SBRs for hunting.
Yes, I am a Baptist, and yes I carry a gun. You might think I carry a gun because I don't trust God. Well you would be wrong. I have complete faith in my Lord. It is mankind I have no trust in
ProdigalSun
Silent But Deadly
Posts: 339
Joined: Fri Jan 02, 2015 10:54 pm

Re: Hearing Protection Act

Post by ProdigalSun »

We did make 100,000 signatures this morning on the repeal petition. Now if we can get the congress critters to uphold their oaths :lol: maybe we can get it passed. I'm sure the machine gun infringements will be retained. :roll: 105,776 signed as I post here.
NFA Not F**king American

It would be less disrespectful to burn the flag than to put a thin blue line through the middle of it.
ProdigalSun
Silent But Deadly
Posts: 339
Joined: Fri Jan 02, 2015 10:54 pm

Re: Hearing Protection Act

Post by ProdigalSun »

g22rmr wrote:Rep. Ted Deutch (FL-22)


Literally no point in contacting this Deutch. See what I did there. All I can do is keep voting against him.

Gowdy and Chaffetz need to be pushed on this. They didn't get results on all the investigations. Now is the time for results, put up or shut up.
Every time you contact your pet demonrat, you remind them that we are watching . :shock:
NFA Not F**king American

It would be less disrespectful to burn the flag than to put a thin blue line through the middle of it.
ncorry
Silent But Deadly
Posts: 551
Joined: Fri Jan 02, 2009 1:17 pm
Location: Little Rock

Re: Hearing Protection Act

Post by ncorry »

Something must be wrong. The Washington Post and NPR have both published articles that are unbiased and even pretty favorable for the HPA within the last couple of days.

http://www.npr.org/2017/03/21/520953793 ... ety-threat

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/fac ... fb1611e08b
tfbit
Silent But Deadly
Posts: 1165
Joined: Sun Apr 01, 2012 12:18 am

Re: Hearing Protection Act

Post by tfbit »

Nah... The ATF went backwards again:

http://www.thetruthaboutguns.com/2017/0 ... s-illegal/
ncorry wrote:Something must be wrong. The Washington Post and NPR have both published articles that are unbiased and even pretty favorable for the HPA within the last couple of days.

http://www.npr.org/2017/03/21/520953793 ... ety-threat

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/fac ... fb1611e08b
No matter what you read on the intarweb CCI450s and CCI41s ARE NOT BALLISTICALLY IDENTICAL with H110! I'm also not a intarweb lawyer so I don't argue with anyone who is.
User avatar
A Boy Named Sue
Senior Silent Operator
Posts: 140
Joined: Sun Sep 18, 2016 5:19 am
Location: Louisiana, Down the Bayou

Re: Hearing Protection Act

Post by A Boy Named Sue »

The time calls for dark men to do dark things.
Do not be afraid to lead them to it.
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 23 guests