There, fixed it for ya...300Blk wrote:It is AAC's can. It was test fried.
300blk vs .223 suppressor
Moderators: gds, bakerjw, renegade
Re: 300blk vs .223 suppressor
-
DEVIL DOC
- Silent But Deadly
- Posts: 291
- Joined: Sun Oct 21, 2007 5:15 pm
- Location: As Northeast as you can get
Re: 300blk vs .223 suppressor
That's insane 
Shot placement is a key fundamental which most tired people tend to sleep on, and dark earth is still the new pink. Save the DI's VIVA LA Colt!
Re: 300blk vs .223 suppressor
It was my understading that a .223 can would not fit on an AAC .30cal muzzle device? Is that not true?
-
DEVIL DOC
- Silent But Deadly
- Posts: 291
- Joined: Sun Oct 21, 2007 5:15 pm
- Location: As Northeast as you can get
Re: 300blk vs .223 suppressor
That's incorrect, my M4 2k fits nicely on mine.usmc45 wrote:It was my understading that a .223 can would not fit on an AAC .30cal muzzle device? Is that not true?
Shot placement is a key fundamental which most tired people tend to sleep on, and dark earth is still the new pink. Save the DI's VIVA LA Colt!
Re: 300blk vs .223 suppressor
The outer wall did not even bulge.
Re: 300blk vs .223 suppressor
So in first grade math I learned that a 3 was bigger than a 2. Please tell me the problem was discovered before the two full mags. I guess if you realized you screwed your can with the first round, keep going?
-
rockrivershooter
- Silent But Deadly
- Posts: 841
- Joined: Mon Oct 24, 2011 8:35 pm
Re: 300blk vs .223 suppressor
300Blk wrote:It is AAC's can. It was test fired.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 19 guests