300 BO AR Pistol vs IWI 300 BO Tavor
Posted: Mon Jul 11, 2022 12:35 pm
I do know the difference between the two. I know one is very modular and the other is a bull pup. I also know the trigger difference and that Giessle can make up for that if need be. But here is what I am looking to do and see which is best or your thoughts:
I have a 300 BO pistol now and am wanting to use it for an all round purpose pistol. It is being used as a HD but also as a tool to get out of issues if I need to. I just pray I never need it for that.
I am wanting to do some things with my pistol that I want to make sure it does not go over to the SBR side of things. I want some sights (I have irons on now) and I have a brace that was purchased from a LGS here in my area.
I have no restrictions other than the normal nonsense restrictions that the ATF and our "representatives" put on us but outside of that, I guess you would say a free state.
However, I want the versatility of having either a LPVO or a red dot and a flip to side magnifier. On a pistol, I am entering a gray area there.
If you have shot both, which do you say? Why? I have never held a Tavor, let alone seen one, so I am speaking from inexperience. The AR I have been using them for several years now and love the platform. Went from a rifle to a pistol for the HD and easy carry, but the Tavor gives that as well without the SBR issues that can arise.
Any thoughts on this would be appreciated. I have searched other places, such as ar15.com, Tavor forums, bull pup forums, and all I found were, "Stick with the AR. It is the best!" or "Those who do not own a Tavor have no idea what they are speaking about. Go Tavor, it is the best!" and then, "Pistols? Why that when you can have a bullpup? Bullpups are the best!"
I figure that this place is set on the 300 blackout and as long as it stays that caliber, I am hoping to actually have a strong conversation one way or another. Thanks for the help.
I want versatility, the ability to carry a compact setup, have more than the Iron Sights without SBR risks, and maintain my 300 BO. Either way, I am good. Thanks in advance.
I have a 300 BO pistol now and am wanting to use it for an all round purpose pistol. It is being used as a HD but also as a tool to get out of issues if I need to. I just pray I never need it for that.
I am wanting to do some things with my pistol that I want to make sure it does not go over to the SBR side of things. I want some sights (I have irons on now) and I have a brace that was purchased from a LGS here in my area.
I have no restrictions other than the normal nonsense restrictions that the ATF and our "representatives" put on us but outside of that, I guess you would say a free state.
However, I want the versatility of having either a LPVO or a red dot and a flip to side magnifier. On a pistol, I am entering a gray area there.
If you have shot both, which do you say? Why? I have never held a Tavor, let alone seen one, so I am speaking from inexperience. The AR I have been using them for several years now and love the platform. Went from a rifle to a pistol for the HD and easy carry, but the Tavor gives that as well without the SBR issues that can arise.
Any thoughts on this would be appreciated. I have searched other places, such as ar15.com, Tavor forums, bull pup forums, and all I found were, "Stick with the AR. It is the best!" or "Those who do not own a Tavor have no idea what they are speaking about. Go Tavor, it is the best!" and then, "Pistols? Why that when you can have a bullpup? Bullpups are the best!"
I figure that this place is set on the 300 blackout and as long as it stays that caliber, I am hoping to actually have a strong conversation one way or another. Thanks for the help.
I want versatility, the ability to carry a compact setup, have more than the Iron Sights without SBR risks, and maintain my 300 BO. Either way, I am good. Thanks in advance.