300BlkTalk

The Super Bowl has been turned into a circus. Not really very interesting anymore unless your team is in it.

So I went down to my local gun shop and they had a Silencer Co Omega in stock. I bought it filled out the paperwork, and BAM get a check in the mail from the NFA saying the application was being rejected because the suppresser wasn't in stock. Again, I put my hands on it, have y'all heard of anythi...

Chuckles wrote:
Remember folks, no president(s) have restricted your gun rights via executive order more than the Bush's. Carry on, facts be damned.

You are referring to import ban?

plant.one wrote:

FormerNavy wrote:I still think lawsuits will be forthcoming over this....

probably many of them from the CLEO's who are still going to refuse to approve/sign off.

glad i put that form1 in a few days ago

CLEO signoff is eliminated.
prints/photos for all.

Local gunshop has AAC 16 MPW with the 13.5 knights rail on it. Haven't seen any of the 9 or 12 " around lately. I already have a AAC sdn6 that I use on 5.56 at and my 7.62x51 carbine. Thinking of picking it up for hunting and plinking. Any common issues with that rifle that should be of concer...

Also, for your information, a nonlicensee may manufacture a semiautomatic rifle for his or her own personal use. As long as the firearm remains in the custody of the person who manufactured it, the firearm need not be marked with a serial number or name and location of the manufacturer. However, if...

I wonder if a letter to the ATF would clarify whether "multi" satisfies the caliber requirement for an individual that is not a manufacturer. Multi is not a caliber and it does not satisfy the caliber requirement, whether licensee or non-licensee. I suspect the marking requirements are di...

A Homemade firearm does not need to be marked, even if you later decide to sell it.

SNs were not required on Title I till 1968, so there are a whole bunch of them out there. 4473 has instructions on how to xfer a firearm with NSN. No big deal.

Sithlord wrote:

NannySlayer wrote:
I don't think 'multi' on a lower has ever been challenged as valid/invalid.

Multi has no legal meaning and is basically irrelevant engraving.

As long as BBL is engraved, you are GTG.

Dolomite_Supafly wrote:The only.marking requirement when you SBR is the name of the maker abd rhw city, state.

There is no legal requirement to mark caliber anywhere on the gun.

Wrong, whatever that jibberish was. CFR is clear on what markings need to be on a SBR. Prior responses were correct.